Comparison of Urban Sociological Theories Essay

par of Urban Sociological Theories In order for an urban sociologist to discover How urban societies add, theories of urban ecology or political economy are use as a guide in their research. Urban ecology refers to the importance of hearty structure and companionable governing as shaping cordial life in the urban center. Urban ecologist concerns for well-disposed order, amicable cohesion, community ties and social diametricaliation offer key insight to how societies work (Kleniewski, 2001). Alternatively political economy stresses the use of power, mastery and resources in the shaping of cities (Kleniewski, 2001).Urban sociologists theoretical improvement to research questions is based on fundamental assumptions that they buzz off most useful for understanding the operation of the social world. Therefore researchers using these different theories will gestate different questions, examine different data and figure their findings in different ways (Kleniewski, 2001). I n the proto(prenominal) years of 1910-1920, a time of social channelise and urban growth, urban sociologists in the United States, the gelt School, were directly confronted by the diversity, liveliness and apparent atomisation of urban life.The urban sociologists of the Chicago School displace a concern for order, cohesion and social relationships (Kleniewski, 2001). The join of the Chicago School of urban sociology was Robert E. greens. He believed that cities are like living organisms, composed of interconnected part and that each part relates to the structure of the metropolis as a whole and to the other parts (Kleniewski, 2001). Park called his approach to urban life human ecology, a term used interchangeably with urban ecology. gracious ecology studies the social norms which are rooted in the relationship between human populations and the environment or territories they inhabit, stressing the orderly interaction of inter parasitic parts of social life in urban areas (K leniewski, 2001). Human ecologist, Louis Wirth shared out with the theoretical antecedents of urban ecology, Tonnies, Durkheim and Simmel, the notion that social interactions in cities were different from social interactions in rural areas or small communities.He believed that social interactions in newfangled industrial cities were impersonal and fragmented. He believed that factors such as size, density, and heterogeneity were responsible for social relations arrange in cities (Kleniewski, 2001). This theory of human ecology was used to study human behavior such as, lives of group members, homeless people and immigrants and to study changing estate of the realm uses over time in order to showing how the different populations of the city adapt to and compete for territories (Kleniewski, 2001.In comparison to urban ecology, political economy is implicated with how urban societies work. Although, political economist developed different understandings and interpretations of how urban societies actually work. In the 1970s the city had many social problems which included welfare, unemployment and tax inflations. theoretician of political economy, Marx, Engels and Weber viewed the city as a site of struggle due to unequal scattering of resources (Kleniewski, 2001).Therefore in contrast to the urban ecology theory of humans being immediately dependent on their environment, the theory of political economy stresses that the city relies not only on its environment only if its social arrangement, economic and political functions. Also in contrast to urban ecology, residential patterns are not only influenced by humans precisely adapting to their infixed environment but by economic inequalities. This leads to competition. In contrast to urban ecology, competition not just among groups for space but among groups for control of economic resources. governmental economists theorize that social norms, in contrast to urban ecology are not only influenced by size and density of the population but in addition influenced by the values of dominant groups (Kleniewski, 2001). These struggles or social forces help shape urban patterns and urban social life. Therefore, class, social status, political power, racial and ethnic conflicts alike play a major role in shaping the city (Kleniewski, 2001). The Political Economy linear perspective